Skip to main content

1927 - ...ish

1927
In the early '90s I was rummaging through the discount discs at A&B Sound and I stumbled upon a couple of CDs by a band called 1927. I had never heard of them, but something about them looked cool. Pre-internet there was no easy way to find out about bands and stuff, so music had to stand on its own merit.

Getting the two albums at once was fun, like the old Monty Python gag it was an instant record collection. Thankfully both ...ish and the Neapolitan self-titled album were really good. It would be ...ish that I played more often, not that I remember it being the better album, it's just the one I pull out when I think of the band.

This was Australian synth heavy pop with big guitars and great vocals. Yes, back in the '80s Australia had a sound, go figure. 1927 sounded a bit like Icehouse. It wasn't so much Icehouse as it was that vocalist Eric Weideman sounded a lot like Iva Davies, who was by default - Icehouse. Icehouse at the time was hot. ...ish came out a year after Man of Colours, an album that went seven times platinum in Australia, moving just shy of 500,000 copies. There was an appetite for music like this.

When I found this in '92 the echoes of the '80s were still bouncing off the walls and this slick AOR was very much my jam. 1927 arrived unheralded over here and while I didn't play the albums a lot, they made an impression - especially the debut.

insert
Musical tastes were changing as the '80s drew to a close, and as with all things the only constant is change (follow me for more half baked aphorisms): "There is a time for everything, and a season for every activity under the heavens." Who doesn't love Ecclesiastes?

When I mention Iva Davies, or call out Icehouse it is not as a slight, or meant to demean 1927. Which is odd, considering how many bands I've thrown under the bus, and then backed the bus up and then driven over them again because I think they're pointlessly derivative. Don't ask me why 1927 gets a pass. They do. Perhaps it's because they evoke the best bits I liked about Icehouse and were their own band.

It's not like I'm oblivious to how "safe" this was at the time. It was a veritable collage of musical cliches and paint by numbers generic rock. Haters gonna hate, and as much as I can identify the weaknesses here, I also have to be transparent and let you know this pushed a lot of my happy buttons. I don't eschew commercial rock just because it's commercial.

Which by the way is about the dumbest and most indefensible musical genre description ever. Commercial in terms of what? Sales, the musical flavour of the day, what was on Top 40 radio ... I suppose it was all three. There was commercial, and then there was commercial. Commercial rock was my sweet spot. Foreigner, Journey, Styx, April Wine, Def Leppard and even Bon Jovi. At some point they all sat in the epicentre of what was commercial when they were hot ... and when they weren't did it make them less commercial? Yes, it did ... but the music didn't change. See the difference? I know this is as logical as an ouroboros being able to swallow and come back for another bite, but it sort of makes sense if you squint and look at it sideways.

When I found a copy of ...ish on vinyl I didn't hesitate and snapped it up. Right from the opening "To Love Me" (which felt a lot like a kissing cousin to Icehouse's "Great Southern Land") I was transfixed and transported back in time. As I only have one record, and as this is the record I have this is the one I'm writing about. I'm sure it would be a different story if I'd have found a copy of their third release on vinyl, but I didn't.

insert
At the time I had no idea who these guys were, or how big a deal this was when it came out. All I knew was that it was a pretty cool album, and I really liked a lot of the songs. It wasn't until I found the record that I started reading up on the band. Five singles were released from ...ish, with two cracking the top 10 and two more reaching the top 20. The final single, "To Love Me," stalled at No. 70, which to me was perplexing as this is one of the best songs on the record in my opinion. I wonder if this was nothing more than fatigue and a case of going one too many times to the well. Coincidentally, all five songs came from the first side.

1927 was anchored by James Barton on drums and Bill Frost on bass guitar. Bill's brother Garry Frost played guitar and keyboards. Front and centre was Eric Weideman on lead vocals and guitar. These guys were really good. Garry in particular seemed to be the sonic architect as he either wrote or co-wrote all of the songs on the album.

This was a nicely polished collection of rock songs. There was just enough crunch to appeal to the rock crowd, and it was melodic and pretty. With ...ish, the stars aligned, and the album caught people's attention. This was the flavour of the day, and people ate this up. Suddenly 1927 found themselves in the right place at the right time with the right sound, and ...ish would move over 350,000 copies and be certified 5 times platinum. It would be their best-selling album by far, and one of the best-selling debut albums in Australian history.

When they released their follow-up The Other Side in 1990 it would go platinum but comparatively it was a pretty steep decline. It's not like Icehouse themselves fared any better when they released Code Blue that same year. It was about 400,000 copies lighter than Man of Colours. It was still a platinum album, and most bands would kill to have an album only be platinum.

To answer the next question, no, the second side wasn't all filler. "Give the Kid a Break" is a standout track on an album chock full of standout songs. Fading out the song felt like a cop out. Oh well, if this is my biggest complaint I have nothing to complain about.

Incidentally, those Icehouse comparisons turned out to be mostly present on the lead off track "To Love Me" and as the album played I found myself just thinking about 1927, and not trying to associate them with anyone else.

back cover
Kind of a nifty trick.

If I'd never found the record I'd have never learned all this cool stuff about 1927.

This is a hell of a record. This was more than good ...ish, it was excellent ...ish.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Styx - Paradise Theater

Styx was hands down one of my favourite bands as a kid. They were a strange band, even back then. They were a hard rock band, almost progressive at times, who had a penchant for sucky ballads. I know there's a tendency for people to zero in on "Babe" as the song that killed the band's credibility. The roots go way back to almost the beginning when Styx released "Lady" on their second album. It showed a side to the band that needed to be kept in check, and for the most part the band kept things on a pretty tight leash. The band had been setting a gruelling pace, releasing an album a year (two in 1972) and by the time they released Paradise Theater (if I end up writing theatre later it's because that's how we spell it here) in 1981 they'd dropped ten albums in less than a decade. I snapped this up as soon as I saw it, and it became a fixture on my turntable. Like the band had announced on "Borrowed Time" from 1979's Cornerstone , ...

David Baerwald - Bedtime Stories

The little sticker on the shrinkwrap says, "You may remember David Baerwald from David & David's Boomtown ..." You bet, I remembered David Baerwald. Back in 1986 Boomtown was an album with moments of sheer brilliance. The whole album may not have been as top shelf as the first few tracks, but that didn't matter - it is an excellent album. I waited for a follow-up ... and waited, and then in 1990 it was a solo David, David Baerwald,  who dropped Bedtime Stories . I snapped it up. "All For You," the opening cut, is still my favourite song on the album. It was mesmerizing. I'm not sure if the song got any airplay, it may have, but that may have been wishful thinking on my part as it was on a lot of mix tapes at the time and I heard it a lot in the car. The CD had a great booklet with all of the musician credits and lyrics. Oddly, when I found a sealed copy of the record (a great score), it just had a plain paper insert - the picture of David walking wit...

Gary Numan - The Pleasure Principle

"Cars" was really the only song I knew by Gary Numan. I knew the name of the album the song came from. Over the years bits and pieces of trivia are accumulated, but in terms of his music it was still distilled down to one song ... It would be too easy to write Mr. Numan off as a one hit wonder, and I suppose in terms of actual chart hits this was his defining moment as a solo artist. Of course this really means nothing, as Gary Numan would drop an album a year pretty much through to the end of the '80s. He'd then slow down a little but continued to make music. While The Pleasure Principle was Gary Numan's debut solo release in '79, he actually cut his teeth on a couple of albums in a band called Tubeway Army, first with the band's self-titled release in 1978, and then on Replicas that came out in April of '79. By the end of Tubeway Army's run most of the band would follow Gary into his solo career. Paul Gardiner, who had been with Gary from the b...